RE: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
To: "'Dimitre Novatchev'" <dnovatchev@gmail.com>,"'Jim Tivy'" <jimt@bluestream.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:07:59 +0100

> The implementation of Higher Order Functions (HOF) in XSLT (1.0 or
> 2.0) would not have been possible if the namespace mechanism 
> was not available.

I think you mean "some kind of namespace mechanism". The current namespace
mechanism is probably better than having none at all, but it still has many
serious problems.

Regards,

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  - From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com>

References:
- XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  - From: Laurens van den Oever <laurens@xopus.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com>
- RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  - From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  - From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>
- RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  - From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
- Do namespaces address all use cases well
  - From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com>
- Namespace use cases
  - From: Micah Dubinko <micah.dubinko@marklogic.com>
- RE: Namespace use cases
  - From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  - From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]