XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Wikipedia on XML

On Aug 23, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:

> Were we starting over today, I would argue strongly in favor of
> eliminating the internal DTD subset entirely and leaving the
> definition of the schema language outside the spec so that the DOCTYPE
> could point to schemas in different languages which parser vendors
> would be free to implement or not as they chose.

Agreed, and I'd go further; I'd totally eliminate <!DOCTYPE>.   
Frankly, I have no interest in an instance's opinion about which  
schemas it thinks are relevant.  The nice thing about XML is I, the  
receiver, decide how best to validate or otherwise process.  -T


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS