[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
- From: rjelliffe@allette.com.au
- To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:06:54 +1100
>>
>> It's just this kind of thing that gets XML a bad name. The
>> horse of XML Schema bolted a long time ago. Making clarity
>> suffer in the name of correctness is a poor decision.
>>
>
> Eh? I'm sure it's correct that many people would assume that a W3C
> specification for "xml-schema" refers to the W3C specification entitled
> "XML
> Schema", and that it's therefore better to choose a different name. That's
> for the sake of clarity, not for the sake of correctness.
I would prefer <?xml-document-type ... ?> myself, but it would have no
chance!
XSD and RELAX NG Schemas pretty much attach to single namespaces
(Schematron doesn't at all) so the document-type is what you get from
combining several schemas in order to limit/explain what is allowed in the
document.
Cheers
Rick Jelliffe
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]