[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] Need to import the XML schema namespace
- From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
- To: "'Jeff Greif'" <jgreif@alumni.princeton.edu>
- Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 14:54:48 +0100
It says "the same as one of the following", not "the same as exactly one of
the following". I agree there's a minor ambiguity, but my view is that if
it's the same as two of the following, then it's inevitably the same as one
of them.
Regards,
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Greif [mailto:jeff.greif@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Greif
> Sent: 06 May 2010 14:29
> To: Michael Kay
> Cc: 'Jeff Greif'; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Need to import the XML schema namespace
>
> So since a namespace subject to 4.2 must satisfy exactly one
> of 4.2.[1-4], the QName's namespace cannot both be the XML
> Schema namespace and be specified in an <import>; therefore
> <import> of the XML Schema namespace is not allowed.
>
> Is this the intended resolution of the question?
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
> On 5/6/2010 2:10 AM, Michael Kay wrote:
> >
> > Like many omissions in XSD 1.0, this one is tidied up in
> XSD 1.1: see
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-1/#src-resolve (clause 4.2.3)
> >
> > You'll see that this clause is missing from XSD 1.0:
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#src-resolve
> >
> > which is a known bug.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Michael Kay
> > http://www.saxonica.com/
> > http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jeff Greif [mailto:jeff.greif@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
> >> Greif
> >> Sent: 06 May 2010 04:48
> >> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> >> Subject: [xml-dev] Need to import the XML schema namespace
> >>
> >> Most XML Schemas in the wild reference some of the types in the
> >> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema namespace, but they usually do so
> >> without explicitly importing it, so it apparently unnecessary in
> >> practice, if not normatively.
> >>
> >> I can't find any reference in the XML Schema 1.0 spec that
> says it is
> >> either illegal or unnecessary to import this namespace,
> for example,
> >> using xs:import. Similarly, I can't find any further
> >> interoperability guidelines on this subject in the
> WSI-Basic Profile
> >> 1.0.
> >>
> >> Does anyone have a reference to a definitive statement of whether
> >> this import is required, optional or forbidden in XML Schemas that
> >> reference the data types of this namespace?
> >>
> >> Jeff
> >>
> >>
> >> ______________________________________________________________
> >> _________
> >>
> >> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by
> OASIS to
> >> support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the
> >> archives, you must subscribe before posting.
> >>
> >> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> >> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
> >> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org List archive:
> >> http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> >> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
> >>
> >
> >
>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]