[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] A little experiment to compare external entities andXInclude
- From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
- To: "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:16:24 -0400
I wrote:
>> 2. <xi:include> elements are resolved by the XML parser, correct?
And Ken Holman responded:
> I wouldn't think so. An XML processor is defined by the XML
> specification and XInclude is a supplemental specification that isn't
> part of the definition of XML. I would expect an XInclude processor
> (if such exist ... I haven't had to look for one) would incorporate
> an XML processor and would give you what you want.
I was under the impression that XInclude occurred within the XML parser based on this statement that I read on another list:
"... that gets expanded during xml parsing (xinclude, ...)"
The statement is false?
I wrote:
>> 6. What XML parsers support XInclude?
And Michael Glavassevich responded:
> Both Xerces-J and Xerces-C++ have support for XInclude.
Michael, do you mean that XInclude in built _within_ the Xerces-J and Xerces-C++ XML parsers? Or, do you mean that the Xerces-J and Xerces-C++ XML parsers are _supplemented_ (extended) with XInclude?
/Roger
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]