[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Data Interoperability ... Why do some XML vocabulariesspecify meaning + behavior whereas others specify only meaning?
- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:16:40 +0100
On 20/08/2010 12:57, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
> 2. Data interoperability is not achieved through shared understanding of the XML vocabulary. Data interoperability is achieved through shared usage of the Prime App.
>
I'd say that is the most extreme opposite of the XML (SGML) philosophy
that one could imagine.
You can have a binary opaque format and a unique application that
processes that data, or...
You can take the view that data is the primary thing and so long as the
data is encoded in a documented (or even partially self documenting)
format such as XML, different applications that may use completely
different internal models may share the data effectively.
It would have been a disaster if every XML process had had to use
whichever XML parser came first, or had to use the DOM for example.
Why should Maple interpreting MathML use any code shared with a browser
displaying the same MathML? What is the Prime application?
David
________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs.
________________________________________________________________________
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]