[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Data Interoperability ... Why do some XMLvocabularies specify meaning + behavior whereas others specify only meaning?
- From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
- To: "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:33:07 -0400
David Carlisle wrote:
> It would have been a disaster if every XML process had had to use
> whichever XML parser came first, or had to use the DOM for example.
Thanks David. I realize that I was not clear on this.
The XML Processor is a perfect example of my thesis. The class of XML Processors is the Prime App for XML. At the very heart of XML interoperability is the XML Processor. Xerces-J, Xerces-C++, and Expat are instantiations of the Prime App. One XML Processor may be selected over another because it is smaller or faster or is implemented in a particular programming language. But they all behave the same way (at least theoretically).
Here's another example: For (X)HTML the Prime App is the class of Web browsers. Firefox and IE are instantiations of the Prime App.
/Roger
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]