[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] My report on experiments with unused namespaces
- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:11:55 +0100
On 22/09/2010 15:21, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
> Can anyone think of a case where a DTD would not detect an unused namespace?
"unused namespace" is still a largely undefined term, so it's not clear
that the question means anything, but mixing dtds and namespaces is
fraught with problems. In particular any use of namespaces with
different prefixes would be schema valid but dtd invalid (unless you
change the dtd to match).
Also, because "unused" isn't defined I can't tell whether or not the
following document which is dtd valid is an instance of a dtd failing to
detect if the namespace is used.
<!DOCTYPE x [
<!ELEMENT x EMPTY>
<!ATTLIST x xmlns:foo CDATA #IMPLIED>
]>
<x xmlns:foo="bar"/>
David
________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs.
________________________________________________________________________
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]