XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Assembly-language XML parser

On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 10:10 -0700, Rob Cameron wrote:

[...]

> Of course, this is still a research effort and the XML 
> community may be more interested in practical parsers.
> On that note, we have now switched emphasis from development
> of a standalone Parabix parser to development of
> accelerated versions of existing tools (Xerces, Saxon, etc.).

This is definitely a good idea!

[...]

> (4) Test the application against the W3C XML conformance
> suite (DTDless subset).

Please note (with my pedantic W3C hat on my head) that W3C doesn't
actually publish conformance tests for parsers -- rather, the test
is to see if the specification has been implemented.

So although these tests seem useful to people, you should also look
for parser-specific regression tests.

Best,

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS