OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web

>Namespaces was at least the nose of the shark.

>Schemas are bad, but ignorable.

Interestingly, namespaces and schemas are bad for very different reasons.

Namespaces are bad because they were done hastily without taking time to 
consider the consequences (or rather, without listening to the many 
people who were pointing out the consequences). They were a cheap hack, 
implemented at the wrong layer of the architecture, and without thinking 
carefully about the data model. The spec was short, informal, and 

Schemas are bad because they tried to do too much and to do it 
"properly". Too many people were involved and they were all allowed to 
add their favourite features. The spec was long, formal, and unreadable.

So in terms of "how to create a good standard", the lessons to be 
learned are very mixed.

Michael Kay

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS