XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web

On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:34:13 -0000
"Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> wrote:

> I wonder whether XInclude should be part of the base spec?

I'd be tempted, except I *could* view that as an application?
Should it be included as part of the base spec or left
to a processor, using xInclude syntax [before|during] the parse?

Comment from a parser writer?

> 
> Maybe Tim or some other XML 'elder' should get the xmllite.org domain
> name, put up a spec, and see how much traction it gets.  If it gets
> any take up it could be pushed back into the W3C.

See if it has any traction here first perhaps?

-- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS