XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] What's wrong with namespaces? Some observations and suggestions

>On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote:
>
>
> Elements should have simple (string-valued) names, using hierarchic naming to achieve uniqueness, and context-sensitive abbreviation to achieve conciseness. It should always be legitimate to use the full name if abbreviation is not wanted.
>
> Hierarchic naming: for example an element might be called :org.w3c.html.table.
>
> Abbreviation: this might be abbreviated to "table". How is the abbreviated name resolved? Using the hierarchic name of the parent element. So the outermost element gives the full name
>
> <:org.w3c.html.html>
>
> and inner elements can use abbreviated names if they are in the same "namespace":
>
> <:org.w3c.html.html>
> <head>
> <title>...</title>
> </head>
> <body>
> <:org.w3c.svg.svg>
> <rectangle>
>           ....
>
> Of course, this is hopelessly incompatible. Or is it? One could devise a transition mechanism. If we see something like
>
> <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"; version="2.0">
>
> then we could regard that as merely a quaint old-fashioned way of saying
>
> <:org.w3c.www.1999.XSL.Transform.stylesheet version="2.0">
>
> Hierarchic naming with optional abbreviation works so well across so many branches of computing, and indeed real life (for example phone numbers); it's a tragedy that it wasn't adopted from the start.
>

Very nice!  Just out of interest, would the following (or some slight
variation) be valid?

<:org.w3c
 <:html.html>
   <head>
    <title>...</title>
   </head>
   <body>
     <:svg.svg>
      <rectangle>
           ....

Seems that the "." notation should be enough to identify that you're
specifying the name space (to some extent) and a colon ":" isn't
needed for this to work?

--
Peter Hunsberger


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS