Re: [xml-dev] Towards XML 2.0

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

From: Ben Trafford <ben@prodigal.ca>
To: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:39:58 -0800

On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 22:16 -0500, Kurt Cagle wrote: 
>         For a comment syntax, what's wrong with
>         <xml:comment>....</xml:comment>?
>         
> But that's ... that's ...
> 
> 
> That's actually a very decent idea.

I'll third that.

--->Ben

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Towards XML 2.0
  - From: Michael Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com>

References:
- Towards XML 2.0
  - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@ibiblio.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] Towards XML 2.0
  - From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Towards XML 2.0
  - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@ibiblio.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] Towards XML 2.0
  - From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
- Re: [xml-dev] Towards XML 2.0
  - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@ibiblio.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] Towards XML 2.0
  - From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Towards XML 2.0
  - From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]