Re: [xml-dev] XMLisms and HTML parsing and modes

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:30:19 +0000

On 16/12/2010 19:44, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> "Sensible grammar" falls under "theoretical purity"

that's an unfortunate way to categorise something that as currently 
specified is going to cause real confusion and real costs forever.

David

References:
- MicroXML
  - From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] MicroXML
  - From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- XML5: Re: [xml-dev] MicroXML
  - From: rjelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>
- Re: XML5: Re: [xml-dev] MicroXML
  - From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Re: XML5: Re: [xml-dev] MicroXML
  - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@ibiblio.org>
- Re: XML5: Re: [xml-dev] MicroXML
  - From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Re: XML5: Re: [xml-dev] MicroXML
  - From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Re: XML5: Re: [xml-dev] MicroXML
  - From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Re: XML5: Re: [xml-dev] MicroXML
  - From: rjelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>
- XMLisms and HTML parsing and modes (was: Re: XML5)
  - From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]