Re: [xml-dev] Micro XSD for Micro XML?

[Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>]

> Could you please give me a small idea of the MicroXSD to validate SVG?
>

Well SVG isn't written as MicroXML so there's no point.

----
Stephen D Green



On 17 December 2010 14:21, Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Stephen Green
> <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ignoring complexTypes and not attempting to be valid XSD, how about
>> just the following?
>>
>> <element name="schema">
>> <element name="element">
>> <attribute name="name" type="string"/>
>> <attribute name="type" type="string">
>> <!-- enumerations = string integer decimal date -->
>> </attribute>
>> </element>
>> <element name="attribute">
>> <attribute name="name" type="string"/>
>> <attribute name="type" type="string">
>> <!-- enumerations = string integer decimal date -->
>> </attribute>
>> </element>
>> </element>
>>
>> I think it is valid MicoXML, isn't it, and in the spirit of MicroXML
>>  - easy to parse
>>  - easy even to execute in MicroXML parsers if need be
>>
>> Or adding a little more and it could be valid XSD too (but that
>> might be going too far in the direction of XSD).
>
> Could you please give me a small idea of the MicroXSD to validate SVG?
>