Re: [xml-dev] Micro XSD for Micro XML?

[Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>]

MicroRNG

Wow, that's cool!

I guess the potential MicroXML users might think themselves only likely
to use a schema language like this now and then, so having one which
only requires them to be able to handle what these 16 lines define might
be worth their time learning. The shortage of desktop tools which work
on RelaxNG might be a little offputting (hence my sadness at being unable
to complete a MicroXSD subset which allows both a schema to be written
in MicroXML and editing / validating by existing XSD tools). So how 'easy'
would it be to include this in validating MicroXML parsers (if there ever
are such things)? Perhaps easier than having to implement something
like XSD which isn't valid as XSD; perhaps less risky anyway.

----
Stephen D Green



On 24 December 2010 08:00, Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk> wrote:
> From the man who knows a little about everything :-)
> http://recycledknowledge.blogspot.com/2010/12/microrng.html
> A 16 line schema for uxml.
>
> The scope seems about right to me.
>
>
>
> --
>
> regards
>
> --
> Dave Pawson
> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
> http://www.dpawson.co.uk
>