Re: [xml-dev] XML Redux

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:26:59 -0500

> If the aim is a simple syntax for arbitrary data, you could do worse
> than Turtle [1], e.g.

ha, what started off as 'simplifying xml' seems to have ended up at rdf....

There is something vaguely surreal about that.�

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] XML Redux
  - From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>

References:
- XML Redux
  - From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML Redux
  - From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML Redux
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML Redux
  - From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML Redux
  - From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML Redux
  - From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]