[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] [ANNOUNCE] New MicroXML draft available
- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- To: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 13:50:58 -0400
Pete Cordell scripsit:
> So, if you had the two documents:
>
> <book foo:author="John" xmlns:foo="http://example.com/book"/>
>
> and:
>
> <book bar:author="John" xmlns:bar="http://example.com/book"/>
>
> are they considered the same?
In the MicroXML data model they are different.
> What part does the MicroXML parser play in this interpretation, and
> what part the application?
An application MAY choose to consider them the same. If it uses
Element.getAttributeNamespace or some analogue, it's easy to do so.
--
John Cowan cowan@ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan
Assent may be registered by a signature, a handshake, or a click of a computer
mouse transmitted across the invisible ether of the Internet. Formality
is not a requisite; any sign, symbol or action, or even willful inaction,
as long as it is unequivocally referable to the promise, may create a contract.
--Specht v. Netscape
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]