[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Build Rich Complexity from a Small Set ofWell-Defined Markup Combinators
- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- To: Radu Cernuta <radu.cernuta@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:24:13 -0400
Radu Cernuta scripsit:
> In RELAX NG referencing is achieved with rng:ref within one
> rng:grammar pattern, rng:parentRef to the parent rng:grammar pattern
> within the same schema document entity, and rng:externalRef over
> different schema document entities. In all those situations the
> reference is replaced by the referenced.
I agree that I should not have included references in my list. However,
references to element patterns cannot in fact be replaced by their
referents, because they are allowed to be used recursively.
> For allowing redefinitions, additional grammar assembling mechanisms
> are available, namely the merging of grammars using rng:include
> element and the combining of definitions of the same name using the
> combine attribute.
I was attempting to compare apples with apples, and so excluded such
larger constructions.
--
John Cowan http://ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
Arise, you prisoners of Windows / Arise, you slaves of Redmond, Wash,
The day and hour soon are coming / When all the IT folks say "Gosh!"
It isn't from a clever lawsuit / That Windowsland will finally fall,
But thousands writing open source code / Like mice who nibble through a wall.
--The Linux-nationale by Greg Baker
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]