[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?
- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- To: Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 14:59:41 -0500
Alex Muir scripsit:
> Probably the only consistent selection across all tools would be for
> CamelCase.. underscore and minus would give different results across
> different tools.
Any tool that purports to support XML as such (as opposed to being a general
text editor) and doesn't know the rules for XML names, is either misconfigured
or buggy.
--
Let's face it: software is crap. Feature-laden and bloated, written under
tremendous time-pressure, often by incapable coders, using dangerous
languages and inadequate tools, trying to connect to heaps of broken or
obsolete protocols, implemented equally insufficiently, running on
unpredictable hardware -- we are all more than used to brokenness.
--Felix Winkelmann
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]