On 3/8/12 6:57 AM, Richard Salz wrote:
OF1644838E.C79E9C47-ON852579BB.0051F1C3-852579BB.005231FC@us.ibm.com" type="cite">I was there too. IBM's position was not well stated.Sorry about that. We tried very hard to be clear and concise (many internal drafts, etc).My guess, purely speculation, was that IBM killed their participationbased on possible productimpact with their commercial development stacks or something similar.For what it (i.e., my word) is worth, no. There was no hidden agenda, the reasons were what we stated in public. OK. Where's the code? sdw OF1644838E.C79E9C47-ON852579BB.0051F1C3-852579BB.005231FC@us.ibm.com" type="cite">/r$ -- STSM, WebSphere Appliance Architect https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/soma/ |