xml-dev

149 messages in this archive (listed by date, most recent first) | Thread Index

• Re: [xml-dev] Validation of complex content
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 30 Mar 2012 16:35:09 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Validation of complex content
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 30 Mar 2012 15:23:10 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Boolean XML
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 30 Mar 2012 15:06:11 -0000
• Boolean XML
  • From "Toby Considine" <Toby.Considine@gmail.com> on 30 Mar 2012 14:48:36 -0000
• Validation of complex content
  • From Edwin Dankert <edankert@gmail.com> on 30 Mar 2012 12:35:49 -0000
• Unique European XML lectures by expert Ken Holman
  • From "Reinier Kleipool (XML)" <xml@OpenSourceAcademy.nl> on 30 Mar 2012 10:38:32 -0000
• [ANN] Open Source XHTML 5 Resources
  • From Olivier Ishacian <olivier@xmlmind.com> on 28 Mar 2012 08:26:01 -0000
• [ANN] Release of XMLmind XSL-FO Converter v4.6.1
  • From Olivier Ishacian <olivier@xmlmind.com> on 26 Mar 2012 10:45:27 -0000
• [ANN] BaseX 7.2: The EDBT Release
  • From Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com> on 24 Mar 2012 18:31:15 -0000
• [ANN] Zorba 2.2 "Coeus" is out
  • From William Candillon <william.candillon@28msec.com> on 23 Mar 2012 10:14:00 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication
  • From Mike Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com> on 19 Mar 2012 21:43:27 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 19 Mar 2012 20:58:54 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 19 Mar 2012 17:43:54 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 19 Mar 2012 16:51:31 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 19 Mar 2012 15:13:59 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 19 Mar 2012 15:01:56 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 19 Mar 2012 14:45:00 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 19 Mar 2012 14:37:00 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 19 Mar 2012 14:22:07 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 19 Mar 2012 14:19:01 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 19 Mar 2012 14:10:50 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 19 Mar 2012 13:57:55 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 19 Mar 2012 13:45:35 -0000
• Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 19 Mar 2012 13:33:33 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Unqualified forms and Inheritance by Restriction
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 19 Mar 2012 11:36:46 -0000
• [ANN] Release of XMLmind XML Editor v5.2
  • From Olivier Ishacian <olivier@xmlmind.com> on 19 Mar 2012 09:32:36 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Unqualified forms and Inheritance by Restriction
  • From "Toby Considine" <Toby.Considine@gmail.com> on 16 Mar 2012 18:02:16 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Deployability of XMLised HTML - authoritative survey?[redux]
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 16 Mar 2012 15:09:27 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Unqualified forms and Inheritance by Restriction
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 16 Mar 2012 14:52:52 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Deployability of XMLised HTML - authoritative survey?[redux]
  • From Mike Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com> on 16 Mar 2012 14:49:27 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Unqualified forms and Inheritance by Restriction
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 16 Mar 2012 14:13:06 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types and polymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML?
  • From "Toby Considine" <Toby.Considine@gmail.com> on 16 Mar 2012 14:10:00 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Deployability of XMLised HTML - authoritative survey?[redux]
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 16 Mar 2012 13:49:36 -0000
• Unqualified forms and Inheritance by Restriction
  • From "Toby Considine" <Toby.Considine@gmail.com> on 16 Mar 2012 13:47:56 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types and polymorphisma good or bad thing for schemas for XML?
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 16 Mar 2012 13:25:11 -0000
• Deployability of XMLised HTML - authoritative survey? [redux]
  • From Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> on 16 Mar 2012 13:07:05 -0000
• ***Extended deadline: March 26*** COMETS 2012 - 3rd InternationalTrack on Collaborative Modeling and Simulation - Call for Papers
  • From Daniele Gianni <daniele.gianni@gmail.com> on 15 Mar 2012 22:23:54 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types andpolymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML?
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 15 Mar 2012 01:03:59 -0000
• [ANN] Release of XMLmind DITA Converter v2.2
  • From Olivier Ishacian <olivier@xmlmind.com> on 14 Mar 2012 09:11:47 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types and polymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML?
  • From "Lists DMS" <lists@d-m-s.co.nz> on 13 Mar 2012 19:30:42 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types andpolymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML?
  • From Norm Birkett <Norm.Birkett@reval.com> on 13 Mar 2012 13:10:59 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types andpolymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML?
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 13 Mar 2012 11:44:23 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types andpolymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 13 Mar 2012 11:30:04 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types andpolymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML?
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 12 Mar 2012 18:20:37 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types andpolymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 12 Mar 2012 18:12:56 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types andpolymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML?
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 12 Mar 2012 17:15:14 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types andpolymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 12 Mar 2012 17:04:30 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types andpolymorphism a good or bad thing for schemas for XML?
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 12 Mar 2012 16:41:29 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types and polymorphisma good or bad thing for schemas for XML?
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 12 Mar 2012 14:51:55 -0000
• RNG vs. XSD : is the use of abstract types and polymorphism a goodor bad thing for schemas for XML?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 12 Mar 2012 14:37:21 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] what's missing in XML? What's coming?
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 11 Mar 2012 19:46:55 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Is "visible" a part of the data? Toward the day whenthe data is the program
  • From Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 11 Mar 2012 16:25:57 -0000
• Is "visible" a part of the data? Toward the day when the data isthe program
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 11 Mar 2012 14:34:09 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 10 Mar 2012 00:20:49 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] EXI: was : RE: [xml-dev] what's missing in XML? What's coming?
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 9 Mar 2012 16:06:01 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 9 Mar 2012 12:28:44 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From Ken North <ken_north@compuserve.com> on 9 Mar 2012 04:07:42 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 9 Mar 2012 03:44:51 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 9 Mar 2012 03:36:24 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 9 Mar 2012 02:45:23 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Ssx, Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 9 Mar 2012 00:44:05 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 9 Mar 2012 00:03:36 -0000
• Ssx, Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From Stephen Williams <sdw@lig.net> on 9 Mar 2012 00:02:31 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] EXI: was : RE: [xml-dev] what's missing in XML? What'scoming?
  • From Stephen Williams <sdw@lig.net> on 8 Mar 2012 23:35:48 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] What does "optional" mean?
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 8 Mar 2012 23:27:40 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 8 Mar 2012 22:26:35 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 8 Mar 2012 22:20:38 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 8 Mar 2012 21:56:10 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 8 Mar 2012 21:32:07 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 8 Mar 2012 20:48:09 -0000
• anti-xml
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 8 Mar 2012 20:14:02 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> on 8 Mar 2012 20:00:00 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 8 Mar 2012 19:32:18 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From Greg Hunt <greg@firmansyah.com> on 8 Mar 2012 19:21:55 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 8 Mar 2012 18:39:34 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 8 Mar 2012 17:42:05 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From Michael Hopwood <michael@editeur.org> on 8 Mar 2012 17:05:35 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 8 Mar 2012 17:02:35 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 8 Mar 2012 17:00:24 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 8 Mar 2012 16:58:19 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From dvint@dvint.com on 8 Mar 2012 16:57:20 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From Michael Hopwood <michael@editeur.org> on 8 Mar 2012 16:53:37 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 8 Mar 2012 16:44:07 -0000
• RE: Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From Michael Hopwood <michael@editeur.org> on 8 Mar 2012 16:38:56 -0000
• Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 8 Mar 2012 16:27:43 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] EXI: was : RE: [xml-dev] what's missing in XML? What's coming?
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 8 Mar 2012 14:58:45 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] EXI: was : RE: [xml-dev] what's missing in XML? What'scoming?
  • From Stephen Williams <sdw@lig.net> on 8 Mar 2012 08:15:47 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 7 Mar 2012 23:02:02 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com> on 7 Mar 2012 20:34:42 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 7 Mar 2012 13:23:29 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 7 Mar 2012 13:06:07 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML is Like a Box of Chocolates
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 6 Mar 2012 23:26:05 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML is Like a Box of Chocolates
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 6 Mar 2012 23:22:31 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 6 Mar 2012 23:18:48 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML is Like a Box of Chocolates
  • From Mike Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com> on 6 Mar 2012 21:38:22 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML is Like a Box of Chocolates
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 6 Mar 2012 13:48:58 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML is Like a Box of Chocolates
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 6 Mar 2012 02:36:04 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML is Like a Box of Chocolates
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 6 Mar 2012 00:55:00 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 5 Mar 2012 22:55:26 -0000
• RE: XML is Like a Box of Chocolates
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 5 Mar 2012 22:49:45 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML is Like a Box of Chocolates
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 5 Mar 2012 20:39:27 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML is Like a Box of Chocolates
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 5 Mar 2012 17:54:46 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML is Like a Box of Chocolates
  • From Jim Melton <jim.melton@oracle.com> on 5 Mar 2012 17:24:25 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML is Like a Box of Chocolates
  • From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 4 Mar 2012 18:27:57 -0000
• XML is Like a Box of Chocolates
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 4 Mar 2012 14:05:57 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 3 Mar 2012 04:20:57 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@maden.org> on 2 Mar 2012 19:01:15 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 2 Mar 2012 18:52:59 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 2 Mar 2012 18:44:31 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 2 Mar 2012 18:21:53 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RE: Formatting Processing Instructions
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 2 Mar 2012 18:18:12 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Formatting Processing Instructions
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 2 Mar 2012 18:06:05 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 2 Mar 2012 18:03:48 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RE: Formatting Processing Instructions
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 2 Mar 2012 17:55:02 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 2 Mar 2012 17:53:17 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@maden.org> on 2 Mar 2012 17:51:21 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Formatting Processing Instructions
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 2 Mar 2012 17:30:05 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 2 Mar 2012 17:20:39 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 2 Mar 2012 17:05:12 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 2 Mar 2012 16:44:14 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RE: Formatting Processing Instructions
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 2 Mar 2012 16:38:05 -0000
• CSS Selectors for Fragment Identifiers now a W3C Community Group
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 2 Mar 2012 16:17:34 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 2 Mar 2012 16:03:28 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RE: Formatting Processing Instructions
  • From "Betty Harvey" <harvey@eccnet.com> on 2 Mar 2012 15:59:45 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 2 Mar 2012 15:55:21 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 2 Mar 2012 15:52:15 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 2 Mar 2012 15:32:11 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 2 Mar 2012 15:30:50 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RE: Formatting Processing Instructions
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 2 Mar 2012 15:28:22 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 2 Mar 2012 15:24:38 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 2 Mar 2012 15:23:47 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 2 Mar 2012 15:17:20 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 2 Mar 2012 15:08:30 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From <vojtech.toman@emc.com> on 2 Mar 2012 14:47:44 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 2 Mar 2012 14:46:36 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 2 Mar 2012 14:40:15 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 2 Mar 2012 14:30:34 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 2 Mar 2012 14:26:55 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 2 Mar 2012 14:15:48 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 2 Mar 2012 14:09:22 -0000
• Six Reasons Not to use XML Attributes
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 2 Mar 2012 13:51:57 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Formatting Processing Instructions
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 1 Mar 2012 22:53:57 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretation begins
  • From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 1 Mar 2012 16:06:41 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretation begins
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 1 Mar 2012 15:42:26 -0000
• RE: The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretation begins
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 1 Mar 2012 13:43:45 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] The edge of chaos: where syntax ends andinterpretation begins
  • From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 1 Mar 2012 12:34:33 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretation begins
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 1 Mar 2012 11:01:26 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretation begins
  • From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 1 Mar 2012 10:57:23 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretationbegins
  • From Manos Batsis <manos_lists@geekologue.com> on 1 Mar 2012 10:33:00 -0000