XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication

Original Message From: "John Cowan"

> All that parsing and unparsing would be expensive:

That was certainly one of my concerns, does it scale (unscale?!) to the 
tiny?  If the cost of serialization is small compared to the number of cores 
you can throw at a problem then it might cost in.  These days that's 
probably an accessment you have to make on a daily basis!

> you might as well deal
> in binary immutable objects instead.  But otherwise the idea is good and
> has been in use for decades (Unix pipelines being the best-known example).
> The key is to share nothing except immutable objects.

I was thinking the act of serialization could be used to enforce the 
immutability aspects and reduce the changes of unintentionally getting 
access to 'foreign' mutating state.

> See Flow-Based Programming, a framework based on passing around immutable
> packets between components (there are Java, C#, and C++ versions) at
> http://www.jpaulmorrison.com/fbp/ .

Will do, Thanks.

Pete Cordell
Codalogic Ltd
Interface XML to C++ the easy way using C++ XML
data binding to convert XSD schemas to C++ classes.
Visit http://codalogic.com/lmx/ or http://www.xml2cpp.com
for more info



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS