[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type
- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:53:04 +0100
>XML on the web is difficult, so I would say XML has fallen short of
this goal in at least one respect: it's not a hypermedia format.
It's not an EDI standard either, or a format for mail archives, or a
format for publishing scientific articles, or sheet music, or browser
history files, or resumes, or calendars, or museum catalogs, or
insurance policies, or mapping data. Instead, it's a notation for
defining all of these. It's a syntax that allows you to layer your own
vocabulary on top. Hypermedia formats, like all these other things,
belong in the layer on top.
Michael Kay
Saxonica
- References:
- xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type
- From: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca>
- Re: [xml-dev] xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type
- From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
- RE: [xml-dev] xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type
- From: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca>
- RE: [xml-dev] xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type
- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- RE: [xml-dev] xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type
- From: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca>
- RE: [xml-dev] xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type
- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- RE: [xml-dev] xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type
- From: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]