[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
- From: "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com>
- To: "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>,"Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:51:17 -0500
BTW: I'm not saying proper separation of concerns is a bad thing or
that moving the constraints to the schema is a bad thing. In FpML it
quite likely is a good thing as far as visibility goes, but the question
was *will* it get traction and I assert that it depends on to whom it
makes a difference that makes a difference and precisely what the
difference is related to organizational goals.
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-08-13/business/sns-rt-us-jpmorga
n-lawsuitbre87d00y-20120813_1_bond-issue-interest-rates-outstanding-bond
s
How should rates for swaps be enumerated if they are managed and
potentially litigated contract by contract?
len
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]