xml-dev by thread

xml-dev

192 messages in this archive (listed by date and indexed by thread (message-id and subject)) | Date Index

Using the concepts of Category Theory to create better XML datamodels, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 3 Aug 2012 22:41:05 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] Using the concepts of Category Theory to create betterXML data models, From David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> on 3 Aug 2012 22:47:31 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Using the concepts of Category Theory to createbetter XML data models, From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 3 Aug 2012 23:20:45 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Using the concepts of Category Theory to create betterXML data models, From Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> on 4 Aug 2012 15:29:59 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Using the concepts of Category Theory to create betterXML data models, From Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@ibiblio.org> on 5 Aug 2012 12:50:50 -0000
- Re: Using the concepts of Category Theory to create better XML data models, From Nicholas Sushkin <nsushkin@openfinance.com> on 7 Aug 2012 16:53:58 -0000
Entities contain XML tags?, From Dan Shelton <dan.f.shelton@gmail.com> on 4 Aug 2012 06:42:17 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] Entities contain XML tags?, From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 4 Aug 2012 08:59:42 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Entities contain XML tags?, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 5 Aug 2012 08:08:07 -0000
Multiple DOCTYPE in one xml document?, From Dan Shelton <dan.f.shelton@gmail.com> on 5 Aug 2012 04:08:55 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] Multiple DOCTYPE in one xml document?, From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 5 Aug 2012 04:29:36 -0000
Injective, Surjective, and Bijective XML Data Models ... ApplyingConcepts from Category Theory to XML, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 12 Aug 2012 19:25:40 -0000
Re: [xml-dev] Micro-XML is now a proposed W3C group, From Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@verizon.net> on 13 Aug 2012 01:54:33 -0000
Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 14 Aug 2012 12:22:53 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?, From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 14 Aug 2012 12:40:56 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?, From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 14 Aug 2012 12:49:39 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 14 Aug 2012 13:24:11 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 14 Aug 2012 14:10:37 -0000
FtanML, a new markup language, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 14 Aug 2012 12:52:17 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] FtanML, a new markup language, From Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> on 15 Aug 2012 09:19:32 -0000
Update-order of XQuery Update Facility, From "Johannes.Lichtenberger" <Johannes.Lichtenberger@uni-konstanz.de> on 15 Aug 2012 06:19:49 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] Update-order of XQuery Update Facility, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 30 Aug 2012 17:00:29 -0000
notes from Balisage, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 15 Aug 2012 13:02:21 -0000
XPath and prefix bindings, From Fraser Goffin <goffinf@gmail.com> on 15 Aug 2012 17:54:08 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] XPath and prefix bindings, From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 15 Aug 2012 18:45:01 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XPath and prefix bindings, From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 15 Aug 2012 20:20:02 -0000
- Message not availableFollowups by message-id references
  - Message not availableFollowups by message-id references
    - Fwd: [xml-dev] XPath and prefix bindings, From Fraser Goffin <goffinf@gmail.com> on 15 Aug 2012 23:05:31 -0000
- Message not availableFollowups by message-id references
  - Fwd: [xml-dev] XPath and prefix bindings, From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 16 Aug 2012 01:25:29 -0000
XSD 1.1 versus the tandem of XSD 1.0 plus Schematron, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 15 Aug 2012 20:17:42 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: [xml-dev] XSD 1.1 versus the tandem of XSD 1.0 plus Schematron, From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 15 Aug 2012 20:32:00 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XSD 1.1 versus the tandem of XSD 1.0 plus Schematron, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 15 Aug 2012 22:55:08 -0000
Re: [docbook-apps] Small!! Lightweight!! xslt processor which isstandalone!! and runs Docbook/XSL stylesheets?, From Dan Shelton <dan.f.shelton@gmail.com> on 17 Aug 2012 14:31:58 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [docbook-apps] Small!! Lightweight!! xslt processor which isstandalone!! and runs Docbook/XSL stylesheets?, From Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> on 17 Aug 2012 17:23:26 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: [docbook-apps] Small!! Lightweight!! xsltprocessor which is standalone!! and runs Docbook/XSL stylesheets?, From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 17 Aug 2012 18:05:19 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: [docbook-apps] Small!! Lightweight!! xslt processorwhich is standalone!! and runs Docbook/XSL stylesheets?, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 17 Aug 2012 22:12:30 -0000
Plain, C-based xslt processor?, From =?KOI8-R?B?z8zYx8Egy9LZ1sHOz9fTy8HR?= <olga.kryzhanovska@gmail.com> on 17 Aug 2012 23:31:21 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] Plain, C-based xslt processor?, From James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> on 18 Aug 2012 08:01:31 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Plain, C-based xslt processor?, From ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) on 23 Aug 2012 08:15:52 -0000
XSL to C converter?, From Dan Shelton <dan.f.shelton@gmail.com> on 18 Aug 2012 14:12:01 -0000
Rick Jelliffe on designing XML Schemas in a way that support partswhich frequently change, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 19 Aug 2012 12:01:16 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] Rick Jelliffe on designing XML Schemas in a way thatsupport parts which frequently change, From Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> on 19 Aug 2012 18:32:05 -0000
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [docbook-apps] Small!! Lightweight!! xslt processorwhich is standalone!! and runs Docbook/XSL stylesheets?, From Lionel Cons <lionelcons1972@googlemail.com> on 19 Aug 2012 22:40:35 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: [docbook-apps] Small!! Lightweight!! xsltprocessor which is standalone!! and runs Docbook/XSL stylesheets?, From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 19 Aug 2012 23:20:10 -0000
How to implement validation rules in an environment where some datarequirements change frequently while others are unchanging?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 20 Aug 2012 13:20:04 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] How to implement validation rules in an environmentwhere some data requirements change frequently while others are unchanging?, From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 20 Aug 2012 14:02:02 -0000
Re: [xml-dev] How to implement validation rules in an environment where some data requirements change frequently while others are unchanging?, From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 20 Aug 2012 15:05:40 -0000
[ANN] Zorba "Eros" 2.6: The JSONiq Release, From William Candillon <william.candillon@28msec.com> on 20 Aug 2012 20:15:40 -0000
RE: [xml-dev] How to implement validation rules in an environment wheresome data requirements change frequently while others are=?UTF-8?Q?unchanging=3F?=, From <w3c@drrw.info> on 21 Aug 2012 02:48:54 -0000
[ANN] XQuery for MongoDB, From William Candillon <william.candillon@28msec.com> on 21 Aug 2012 09:11:39 -0000
When did you vanish, o' CDATA section wrapper?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 21 Aug 2012 17:14:05 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: When did you vanish, o' CDATA section wrapper?, From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 21 Aug 2012 17:19:39 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] When did you vanish, o' CDATA section wrapper?, From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 21 Aug 2012 17:36:21 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] When did you vanish, o' CDATA section wrapper?, From Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> on 21 Aug 2012 17:56:22 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] When did you vanish, o' CDATA section wrapper?, From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 21 Aug 2012 18:05:26 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] When did you vanish, o' CDATA section wrapper?, From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 21 Aug 2012 18:47:09 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] When did you vanish, o' CDATA section wrapper?, From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 21 Aug 2012 19:05:49 -0000
What is a CDATA injection attack?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 22 Aug 2012 11:24:38 -0000
XML document --> lightweight in-memory tree --> XDM --> Process! ... Who created the XDM data model: the XML Processor or the XSLT Processor?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 22 Aug 2012 19:43:06 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] XML document --> lightweight in-memory tree --> XDM --> Process! ... Who created the XDM data model: the XML Processor or the XSLT Processor?, From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 22 Aug 2012 19:56:43 -0000
[ANN] XML Amsterdam 2012 registration is open!, From Geert Josten <geert.josten@dayon.nl> on 24 Aug 2012 11:55:46 -0000
Announce: update to xmlsh 1.2.1, From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 24 Aug 2012 12:50:43 -0000
Is there any legitimate case for processing based on a specificnamespace prefix?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 28 Aug 2012 20:20:40 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] Is there any legitimate case for processing based ona specific namespace prefix?, From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 28 Aug 2012 21:13:41 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Is there any legitimate case for processing based on a specific namespace prefix?, From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 28 Aug 2012 21:19:03 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Is there any legitimate case for processing based ona specific namespace prefix?, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 28 Aug 2012 22:21:43 -0000
The Rise of Worse is Better, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 29 Aug 2012 11:13:33 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] The Rise of Worse is Better, From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 29 Aug 2012 11:51:42 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] The Rise of Worse is Better, From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 29 Aug 2012 12:49:25 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The Rise of Worse is Better, From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 29 Aug 2012 12:55:16 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The Rise of Worse is Better, From Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> on 29 Aug 2012 15:26:06 -0000

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.0b2