[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
- From: "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com>
- To: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:41:11 -0500
A user of a financial instrument should be able to point directly to the
exact requirement for the value lists and any constraints.
I may be ill-informed but I think FpML is used for derivatives. Can
FpML describe interest rate swaps? If so:
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-08-13/business/sns-rt-us-jpmorga
n-lawsuitbre87d00y-20120813_1_bond-issue-interest-rates-outstanding-bond
s
len
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Welch [mailto:andrew.j.welch@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 8:03 AM
To: Len Bullard
Cc: G. Ken Holman; XML-Dev Mailing list
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
On 15 August 2012 13:58, Len Bullard <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> wrote:
> Given the FpML case where the value constraints can vary by contract
It doesn't though does it?
--
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]