Re: [xml-dev] [XML Schema] Here's how to empower instance documentauthor

["Christopher R. Maden" <crism@maden.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/14/2012 10:24 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> Since MicroXML does not have namespaces, I am attempting to 
> resuscitate architectural forms for it.  See 
> http://home.ccil.org/~cowan/microaf.html for my current proposals. 
> (It will work for either XML or MicroXML.)

I’m forced to ask: why?

Hardly anyone used archforms in SGML, and the facility exists
perfectly well within XML, and no one (other than the XML Linking
Working Group, of which I was a part) saw fit to use it.

I suspect the answer is that the loss of namespaces in MicroXML means
that a facility is needed to replace them... but why not
better-designed namespaces?  One can conceive of namespace
declarations that are not as atrocious as W3C namespaces, but which
are mutually compatible with them (in fact, best practices uses of W3C
namespaces are not, ultimately, so bad).

~Chris
- -- 
Chris Maden, text nerd  <URL: http://crism.maden.org/ >
LIVE FREE: vote for Gary Johnson, Libertarian for President.
     <URL: http://garyjohnson2012.com/ >  <URL: http://lp.org/ >
GnuPG fingerprint: DB08 CF6C 2583 7F55 3BE9  A210 4A51 DBAC 5C5C 3D5E
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQe4nEAAoJEEpR26xcXD1epq0H/RGEIXbS0faWShFUvuuq6LHF
tPXXAPPf093twmTlUKkY2pGiP63F4gIvPaoIV0bfKHoZwOh9+wBo67KGjFc8b4fK
Fa2t7AQtJ+e4Rdn1trN85ZHlpoGms0uZf7yKlDO2Vm5ndYxJV1ljKVyTEDdZ+u0/
+gsCa4Z5h3EdwUBu9YHtLGVH8Hw4BzN7ZhX5I0thPOYpG1LlEpEP2w/ieyc/mA5F
ifsAjI9E6u/9s9SWvbo+ewmC8PgtrUgBk1PpimBL3MXQeljAIVheDpLAxQBACbFg
lAvCSUp4QjDHWV9gu6YAgtjXw2869y+euNx0vDnjovxb25dk2nDvpFN1N2Izn/s=
=TzJw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----