Re: [xml-dev] Which should come first: code, XML Schema, or binary speci

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

Re: [xml-dev] Which should come first: code, XML Schema, or binary specification?

From: Jamie Clark <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org>
To: "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 10:39:25 -0800

A little #XML news, for your US election day enjoyment:

Open data standards are used for electronic balloting in live
elections in the Netherlands and elsewhere, using OASIS EML (the
"Election Markup Language"), endorsed by the Council of Europe.  Now
IEEE is adapting EML for use in the US (the "P1622 project"), to get
past today's completely proprietary, one-company-owns-it systems.

http://j.mp/EML1622  http://j.mp/oasisEML

James Bryce Clark, General Counsel
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
http://www.oasis-open.org/who/staff.php#clark

www.identi.ca/JamieXML
www.twitter.com/JamieXML
http://t.sina.cn/jamiexml
http://www.slideshare.net/jamiexml
http://facebook.com/oasis.open

References:
- Which should come first: code, XML Schema, or binary specification?
  - From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]