88 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
| Thread Index
- Re: [xml-dev] The purpose of a namespace URI is ...
- From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 1 Dec 2012 00:14:16 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The purpose of a namespace URI is ...
- From Fraser Goffin <goffinf@gmail.com> on 30 Nov 2012 22:39:54 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The purpose of a namespace URI is ...
- From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 30 Nov 2012 22:03:23 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The purpose of a namespace URI is ...
- From Fraser Goffin <goffinf@gmail.com> on 30 Nov 2012 20:28:43 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The purpose of a namespace URI is ...
- From Fraser Goffin <goffinf@gmail.com> on 30 Nov 2012 20:23:03 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The purpose of a namespace URI is ...
- From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 30 Nov 2012 18:50:11 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The purpose of a namespace URI is ...
- From Fraser Goffin <goffinf@gmail.com> on 30 Nov 2012 18:31:21 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The purpose of a namespace URI is ...
- From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 30 Nov 2012 17:12:31 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] The purpose of a namespace URI is ...
- From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 30 Nov 2012 17:01:08 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The purpose of a namespace URI is ...
- From Mike Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com> on 30 Nov 2012 16:57:50 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] The purpose of a namespace URI is ...
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 30 Nov 2012 16:40:28 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] The purpose of a namespace URI is ...
- From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 30 Nov 2012 15:53:26 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The purpose of a namespace URI is ...
- From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 30 Nov 2012 15:51:24 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] The purpose of a namespace URI is ...
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 30 Nov 2012 15:07:12 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The purpose of a namespace URI is ...
- From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 30 Nov 2012 15:03:18 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The purpose of a namespace URI is ...
- From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 30 Nov 2012 14:47:22 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The purpose of a namespace URI is ...
- From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 30 Nov 2012 14:17:05 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The purpose of a namespace URI is ...
- From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 30 Nov 2012 13:25:26 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The purpose of a namespace URI is ...
- From Michael Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com> on 30 Nov 2012 13:16:37 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The purpose of a namespace URI is ...
- From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 30 Nov 2012 12:47:17 -0000
- The purpose of a namespace URI is ...
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 30 Nov 2012 12:35:32 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dejavu-l] Another warning to those translating sdlxliff files
- From ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) on 29 Nov 2012 11:06:02 -0000
- Re: [dejavu-l] Another warning to those translating sdlxliff files
- From Nico van de Water <nicovdwater@gmx.de> on 29 Nov 2012 10:32:04 -0000
- W3C ebnf validation.
- From DaveP <davep@dpawson.co.uk> on 29 Nov 2012 09:32:44 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Looking for good xhtml explorer
- From Philip Fearon <pgfearo@googlemail.com> on 28 Nov 2012 15:34:54 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Looking for good xhtml explorer
- From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 28 Nov 2012 12:43:55 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Looking for good xhtml explorer
- From Philip Fearon <pgfearo@googlemail.com> on 28 Nov 2012 12:27:52 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Looking for good xhtml explorer
- From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 27 Nov 2012 23:55:01 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] I understand "codepoints" ... hurrah!
- From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 27 Nov 2012 14:59:54 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] I understand "codepoints" ... hurrah!
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 27 Nov 2012 14:39:36 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] I understand "codepoints" ... hurrah!
- From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 27 Nov 2012 14:24:37 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] I understand "codepoints" ... hurrah!
- From Chris Maloney <voldrani@gmail.com> on 27 Nov 2012 14:12:17 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] I understand "codepoints" ... hurrah!
- From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 27 Nov 2012 14:00:35 -0000
- I understand "codepoints" ... hurrah!
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 27 Nov 2012 13:43:08 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Looking for good xhtml explorer
- From Philip Fearon <pgfearo@googlemail.com> on 27 Nov 2012 13:25:09 -0000
- Looking for good xhtml explorer
- From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 27 Nov 2012 13:03:14 -0000
- [ANN] Balisage 2013 Dates and Venue
- From Tommie Usdin <btusdin@mulberrytech.com> on 26 Nov 2012 20:35:26 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] How many unit tests should I create for my XMLapplication?
- From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 25 Nov 2012 17:56:23 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] How many unit tests should I create for my XML application?
- From Michael Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com> on 25 Nov 2012 03:13:06 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] How many unit tests should I create for my XMLapplication?
- From Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com> on 24 Nov 2012 23:39:25 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] How many unit tests should I create for my XML application?
- From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 24 Nov 2012 22:21:50 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] How many unit tests should I create for my XML application?
- From Timothy Cook <timothywayne.cook@gmail.com> on 24 Nov 2012 18:51:15 -0000
- How many unit tests should I create for my XML application?
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 24 Nov 2012 18:29:45 -0000
- [ANN] Release of XMLmind XSL-FO Converter v4.8
- From olivier <olivier@xmlmind.com> on 23 Nov 2012 13:01:00 -0000
- Please update your paypal account informations
- From "PayPal" <service@paypal.co.uk> on 21 Nov 2012 21:30:27 -0000
- Pearls of XSLT and XPath 3.0 Design
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 21 Nov 2012 12:49:25 -0000
- Re: Fw: [xml-dev] Which latest and greatest XML Standards Should IUse For XML-Grammar-Fortune?
- From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 19 Nov 2012 16:16:57 -0000
- Fw: [xml-dev] Which latest and greatest XML Standards Should I UseFor XML-Grammar-Fortune?
- From Shlomi Fish <shlomif@shlomifish.org> on 19 Nov 2012 15:22:19 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Implementing Closures in XSLT/XPath 3.0
- From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 18 Nov 2012 06:55:01 -0000
- Implementing Closures in XSLT/XPath 3.0
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 17 Nov 2012 23:21:38 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Which latest and greatest XML Standards Should I UseFor XML-Grammar-Fortune?
- From Shlomi Fish <shlomif@shlomifish.org> on 17 Nov 2012 10:29:29 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Terminology: vocabulary, grammar, or something else?(Re: [xml-dev] Which latest and greatest XML Standards Should I Use ForXML-Grammar-Fortune?)
- From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 16 Nov 2012 15:38:17 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Terminology: vocabulary, grammar, or something else? (Re: [xml-dev] Whichlatest and greatest XML Standards Should I Use For XML-Grammar-Fortune?)
- From Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt <STAMMW@de.ibm.com> on 16 Nov 2012 14:38:37 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Terminology: vocabulary, grammar, or something else?(Re: [xml-dev] Which latest and greatest XML Standards Should I Use ForXML-Grammar-Fortune?)
- From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 15 Nov 2012 20:42:35 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Terminology: vocabulary, grammar, or something else? (Re: [xml-dev] Whichlatest and greatest XML Standards Should I Use For XML-Grammar-Fortune?)
- From Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt <STAMMW@de.ibm.com> on 15 Nov 2012 17:14:04 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Terminology: vocabulary, grammar, or something else?(Re: [xml-dev] Which latest and greatest XML Standards Should I Use ForXML-Grammar-Fortune?)
- From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 15 Nov 2012 15:11:18 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Terminology: vocabulary, grammar, or something else?(Re: [xml-dev] Which latest and greatest XML Standards Should I Use ForXML-Grammar-Fortune?)
- From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 15 Nov 2012 15:08:04 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Terminology: vocabulary, grammar, or something else?(Re: [xml-dev] Which latest and greatest XML Standards Should I Use For XML-Grammar-Fortune?)
- From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2012 11:26:42 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Terminology: vocabulary, grammar, or something else?(Re: [xml-dev] Which latest and greatest XML Standards Should I Use For XML-Grammar-Fortune?)
- From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 15 Nov 2012 11:03:55 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Terminology: vocabulary, grammar, or something else?
- From "Graham Hannington" <graham_hannington@fundi.com.au> on 15 Nov 2012 10:21:44 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Terminology: vocabulary, grammar, or something else? (Re: [xml-dev] Which latest and greatest XML Standards Should I Use For XML-Grammar-Fortune?)
- From ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) on 15 Nov 2012 09:23:51 -0000
- Terminology: vocabulary, grammar, or something else? (Re: [xml-dev] Whichlatest and greatest XML Standards Should I Use For XML-Grammar-Fortune?)
- From "Graham Hannington" <graham_hannington@fundi.com.au> on 15 Nov 2012 02:20:52 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Which latest and greatest XML Standards Should I UseFor XML-Grammar-Fortune?
- From Michael Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com> on 15 Nov 2012 00:49:55 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Which latest and greatest XML Standards Should I UseFor XML-Grammar-Fortune?
- From Shlomi Fish <shlomif@shlomifish.org> on 14 Nov 2012 16:45:50 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Which latest and greatest XML Standards Should I UseFor XML-Grammar-Fortune?
- From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 13 Nov 2012 23:51:00 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Which latest and greatest XML Standards Should I UseFor XML-Grammar-Fortune?
- From "Johannes.Lichtenberger" <Johannes.Lichtenberger@uni-konstanz.de> on 13 Nov 2012 22:06:52 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Which latest and greatest XML Standards Should I UseFor XML-Grammar-Fortune?
- From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 13 Nov 2012 19:29:05 -0000
- Which latest and greatest XML Standards Should I Use ForXML-Grammar-Fortune?
- From Shlomi Fish <shlomif@shlomifish.org> on 13 Nov 2012 18:46:04 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Requirements of the editor of a working group thatis developing an XML markup language
- From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 13 Nov 2012 17:08:57 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Requirements of the editor of a working group that isdeveloping an XML markup language
- From Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> on 13 Nov 2012 15:59:03 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Requirements of the editor of a working group that isdeveloping an XML markup language
- From Shlomi Fish <shlomif@shlomifish.org> on 13 Nov 2012 14:21:44 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Requirements of the editor of a working group that isdeveloping an XML markup language
- From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 13 Nov 2012 13:43:05 -0000
- Requirements of the editor of a working group that is developing anXML markup language
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 13 Nov 2012 13:32:49 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Couldn't illegal XML characters be used simply by escaping them?
- From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 10 Nov 2012 16:56:16 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Couldn't illegal XML characters be used simply byescaping them?
- From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 10 Nov 2012 16:32:22 -0000
- RE: Couldn't illegal XML characters be used simply by escaping them?
- From Daniel Sullivan <dsullivan@danal.com> on 10 Nov 2012 14:07:29 -0000
- Couldn't illegal XML characters be used simply by escaping them?
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 10 Nov 2012 13:08:44 -0000
- [ANN] Release of XMLmind XML Editor v5.4.1
- From olivier <olivier@xmlmind.com> on 8 Nov 2012 13:00:06 -0000
- Call for Speakers for BTS Summit 2013 closes November 30
- From Ken North <ken_north@compuserve.com> on 8 Nov 2012 08:35:54 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Which should come first: code, XML Schema, or binary specification?
- From Jamie Clark <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org> on 6 Nov 2012 18:40:04 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Which should come first: code, XML Schema, or binaryspecification?
- From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 5 Nov 2012 16:13:53 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Which should come first: code, XML Schema, or binary specification?
- From Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> on 5 Nov 2012 10:16:14 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Storing illegal XML 1.0 characters in the UnicodePrivate Use Area
- From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 2 Nov 2012 16:04:35 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Storing illegal XML 1.0 characters in the UnicodePrivate Use Area
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 2 Nov 2012 15:28:10 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Storing illegal XML 1.0 characters in the UnicodePrivate Use Area
- From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 2 Nov 2012 15:21:02 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Storing illegal XML 1.0 characters in the Unicode PrivateUse Area
- From Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> on 2 Nov 2012 14:39:36 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Which should come first: code, XML Schema, or binary specification?
- From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 2 Nov 2012 12:45:40 -0000
- Which should come first: code, XML Schema, or binary specification?
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 2 Nov 2012 12:11:25 -0000
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.0b2