RE: [xml-dev] Application of Postel's Law to XML (as Re: Trust andcontro

["Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>]

Hello Amy,

> So far as I can see, XML's insistence on 
> well-formedness is a direct contradiction 
> to Postel's Law. It mandates that receivers 
> be rigorous.

As I read the history of RSS and RSS processors, it appears that there was much argument about whether well-formedness was necessary. Tim Bray argued passionately in favor of requiring that RSS be well-formed: 

http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/01/11/PostelPilgrim

In any case, I am trying to reserve judgment on goodness or badness of the ways in my list. Do you know of other ways beside those in my list for being conservative in what you generate and liberal in what you accept?

Thanks for the feedback.

/Roger

-----Original Message-----
From: Amelia A Lewis [mailto:amyzing@talsever.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 12:10 PM
To: Costello, Roger L.
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Application of Postel's Law to XML (as Re: Trust and control )

On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:57:33 +0000, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
> I want to fully understand what it means to apply Postel's Law to XML.

So far as I can see, XML's insistence on well-formedness is a direct 
contradiction to Postel's Law. It mandates that receivers be rigorous. 
Full stop.

Amy!

_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php