XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Lessons learned from the XML experiment

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Pete Cordell <petexmldev@codalogic.com> wrote:
Original Message From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>

No, I can't in this specific use case.  However, AFAIK there isn't a
published, standards track grammar for your example.

So Java is broken because there's no international standard for package names like org.w3.dom?

How come I didn't notice?

Surely Java is not broken because it has tools to support that 'convention'. XML is broken as far as this convention is concerned because there are no (widely available) tools that implement it.

What do you mean by "implement" here, because as I understand the term *every* XML tool implements it just fine.

-- 
Uche Ogbuji                                       http://uche.ogbuji.net
Founding Partner, Zepheira                  http://zepheira.com
Author, Ndewo, Colorado                     http://uche.ogbuji.net/ndewo/
Founding editor, Kin Poetry Journal      http://wearekin.org
Editor & Contributor, TNB     http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
http://copia.ogbuji.net    http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji    http://twitter.com/uogbuji


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS