xml-dev by thread

xml-dev

485 messages in this archive (listed by date and indexed by thread (message-id and subject)) | Date Index

Parsing pipeline, flow-based programming, grammars and parsing, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 2 Nov 2013 17:20:28 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing pipeline, flow-based programming, grammars and parsing, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 4 Nov 2013 14:10:01 -0000
Moving xml technology development outside of w3c, From Rand McRanderson <therandshow@gmail.com> on 7 Nov 2013 14:35:14 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] Moving xml technology development outside of w3c, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 7 Nov 2013 14:59:15 -0000
Re: xml-dev Digest 7 Nov 2013 14:35:15 -0000 Issue 2878, From Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com> on 7 Nov 2013 14:59:42 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] xml-dev Digest 7 Nov 2013 14:35:15 -0000 Issue 2878, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 7 Nov 2013 15:17:28 -0000
How to validate Schematron embedded in RNC?, From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 7 Nov 2013 22:15:50 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] How to validate Schematron embedded in RNC?, From George Cristian Bina <george@oxygenxml.com> on 7 Nov 2013 23:37:28 -0000
Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 8 Nov 2013 10:31:46 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 8 Nov 2013 11:05:41 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 8 Nov 2013 11:14:32 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 8 Nov 2013 11:29:04 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 8 Nov 2013 14:51:34 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 13 Nov 2013 00:21:34 -0000
Small XML languages versus large XML languages - which is better?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 8 Nov 2013 19:04:27 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] Small XML languages versus large XML languages - whichis better?, From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 8 Nov 2013 20:54:59 -0000
Best options for converting JSON to XML, From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 9 Nov 2013 16:26:32 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] Best options for converting JSON to XML, From Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt <STAMMW@de.ibm.com> on 9 Nov 2013 16:58:45 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Best options for converting JSON to XML, From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 9 Nov 2013 17:26:15 -0000
Michael Kay: simple designs make easy things easier, difficultthings more difficult, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 12 Nov 2013 12:36:55 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] Michael Kay: simple designs make easy things easier,difficult things more difficult, From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 13:47:28 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Michael Kay: simple designs make easy things easier,difficult things more difficult, From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 14:31:30 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Michael Kay: simple designs make easy things easier,difficult things more difficult, From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 14:41:57 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Michael Kay: simple designs make easy things easier,difficult things more difficult, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 13 Nov 2013 11:55:36 -0000
Argument: Software design is important, data design is not, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 12 Nov 2013 14:32:59 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] Argument: Software design is important, data design is not, From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 14:44:36 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Argument: Software design is important, data design is not, From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 14:57:06 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Argument: Software design is important, data design is not, From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 12 Nov 2013 15:00:22 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Argument: Software design is important, data design is not, From Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 15:46:42 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Argument: Software design is important, data designis not, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 12 Nov 2013 16:18:05 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Argument: Software design is important, data designis not, From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 12 Nov 2013 16:30:08 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Argument: Software design is important, data design is not, From Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> on 12 Nov 2013 16:53:47 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Argument: Software design is important, data design is not, From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 17:11:48 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Argument: Software design is important, data design is not, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 12 Nov 2013 17:17:17 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Argument: Software design is important, data design is not, From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 12 Nov 2013 17:36:14 -0000
Elements vs. attributes: the battle continues, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 13 Nov 2013 15:06:49 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] Elements vs. attributes: the battle continues, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 13 Nov 2013 15:55:43 -0000
RE: [xml-dev] Argument: Software design is important, data designis not, From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 14 Nov 2013 14:41:09 -0000
Terminology: data interchange format or data exchange format?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 15 Nov 2013 12:53:24 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] Terminology: data interchange format or data exchange format?, From "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org> on 15 Nov 2013 13:05:13 -0000
[OT] Re: [xml-dev] Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 13:35:00 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] [OT] Re: [xml-dev] Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 15 Nov 2013 15:00:05 -0000
Re: [xml-dev] [OT] Re: [xml-dev] Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 15 Nov 2013 15:21:36 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] [OT] Re: [xml-dev] Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> on 15 Nov 2013 15:35:14 -0000
seduced by markup, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 15 Nov 2013 17:59:05 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] seduced by markup, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 15 Nov 2013 18:35:09 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] seduced by markup, From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 16 Nov 2013 04:49:16 -0000
XML -- information architect, JSON -- program objects, HTML -- Webbrowser, DOM -- unwieldy, XQuery -- straddle programming and infoarchitecture, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 16 Nov 2013 10:32:47 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] XML -- information architect, JSON -- program objects, HTML -- Web browser, DOM -- unwieldy, XQuery -- straddle programming and info architecture, From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 16 Nov 2013 14:07:34 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XML -- information architect, JSON -- program objects,HTML -- Web browser, DOM -- unwieldy, XQuery -- straddle programming and info architecture, From Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> on 18 Nov 2013 05:15:21 -0000
Off-topic: Re: [xml-dev] [OT] Re: [xml-dev] Lessons learned from theXML experiment, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 17 Nov 2013 09:14:05 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] Off-topic: Re: [xml-dev] [OT] Re: [xml-dev] Lessonslearned from the XML experiment, From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 17 Nov 2013 16:27:23 -0000
What Is XML ? WAS : RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Re: [xml-dev] Lessonslearned from the XML experiment, From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 17 Nov 2013 15:38:46 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] What Is XML ? WAS : RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Re: [xml-dev] Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 17 Nov 2013 15:49:30 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] What Is XML ? WAS : RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Re: [xml-dev]Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 17 Nov 2013 16:37:03 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] What Is XML ? WAS : RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Re: [xml-dev]Lessons learned from the XML experiment, From Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com> on 17 Nov 2013 16:45:07 -0000
What Is XML, or MicroXML?, From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 17 Nov 2013 17:05:06 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: [xml-dev] What Is XML, or MicroXML?, From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 17 Nov 2013 17:32:22 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] What Is XML, or MicroXML?, From "Toby Considine" <Toby.Considine@gmail.com> on 17 Nov 2013 17:56:28 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] What Is XML, or MicroXML?, From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 17 Nov 2013 18:23:18 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] What Is XML, or MicroXML?, From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 17 Nov 2013 23:01:34 -0000
A few quotes for the xml-dev Hall of Fame, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 17 Nov 2013 18:25:14 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] A few quotes for the xml-dev Hall of Fame, From Fraser Goffin <goffinf@gmail.com> on 17 Nov 2013 22:45:51 -0000
How to design XML to have broad utility and yet also enableefficient application processing?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 19 Nov 2013 10:42:18 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?, From Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 19 Nov 2013 14:38:47 -0000
MicroXML APIs and MK Namespaces by Convention, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 19 Nov 2013 11:21:02 -0000
Designing information for eternity, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 19 Nov 2013 12:37:22 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] Designing information for eternity, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 19 Nov 2013 13:30:06 -0000
Re: [xml-dev] Designing information for eternity, From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 19 Nov 2013 13:54:10 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair, was Re: [xml-dev] Designinginformation for eternity, From Michael Sokolov <msokolov@safaribooksonline.com> on 20 Nov 2013 01:42:07 -0000
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Seduced by Markup, From Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com> on 19 Nov 2013 15:43:18 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] RE: Seduced by Markup, From Michael Sokolov <msokolov@safaribooksonline.com> on 19 Nov 2013 22:57:28 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RE: Seduced by Markup, From Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com> on 20 Nov 2013 00:29:07 -0000
Cognitive Dimensions of Notations, From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 20 Nov 2013 00:44:57 -0000
Cognitve Complexity: A Suggestion for Improving XML Designs, From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 20 Nov 2013 01:19:58 -0000
Seduced by markup, Take 2, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 20 Nov 2013 16:43:36 -0000
How to do XML design, per Jackson Structured Design, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 20 Nov 2013 23:19:40 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Message not availableFollowups by message-id references
  - Re: [xml-dev] How to do XML design, per Jackson Structured Design, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 21 Nov 2013 02:27:45 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] How to do XML design, per Jackson Structured Design, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 26 Nov 2013 23:46:27 -0000
if namespaces vanished, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 22 Nov 2013 00:16:35 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] if namespaces vanished, From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 22 Nov 2013 00:22:53 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] if namespaces vanished, From "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca> on 22 Nov 2013 12:45:58 -0000
Has my brain been altered by too much time spent writing XSLT, XSD,and namespaces?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 22 Nov 2013 14:48:50 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] Has my brain been altered by too much time spent writing XSLT, XSD, and namespaces?, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 27 Nov 2013 00:04:21 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Has my brain been altered by too much time spentwriting XSLT, XSD, and namespaces?, From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 27 Nov 2013 00:34:04 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Has my brain been altered by too much time spentwriting XSLT, XSD, and namespaces?, From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 27 Nov 2013 04:17:18 -0000
Has Roger's Brain Been Altered?, From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 22 Nov 2013 16:21:25 -0000
<org.w3c.svg> or <org.w3c.svg.svg>, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 22 Nov 2013 19:42:45 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] <org.w3c.svg> or <org.w3c.svg.svg>, From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 25 Nov 2013 11:21:14 -0000
- Re: <org.w3c.svg> or <org.w3c.svg.svg>, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 27 Nov 2013 00:08:46 -0000
The universality of "single starting point", From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 23 Nov 2013 16:51:20 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: The universality of "single starting point", From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 23 Nov 2013 17:02:44 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The universality of "single starting point", From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 23 Nov 2013 17:33:38 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The universality of "single starting point", From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 23 Nov 2013 17:53:29 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The universality of "single starting point", From Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> on 23 Nov 2013 22:48:18 -0000
Binary versus Text, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 24 Nov 2013 14:26:16 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] Binary versus Text, From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 24 Nov 2013 15:40:36 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Binary versus Text, From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 24 Nov 2013 16:01:29 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Binary versus Text, From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 24 Nov 2013 18:24:30 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Binary versus Text, From Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt <STAMMW@de.ibm.com> on 25 Nov 2013 14:07:49 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Binary versus Text, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 26 Nov 2013 14:38:03 -0000
XML as fall guy, From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 24 Nov 2013 18:39:46 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] XML as fall guy, From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 24 Nov 2013 19:37:20 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XML as fall guy, From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 24 Nov 2013 21:03:39 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XML as fall guy, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 27 Nov 2013 00:01:36 -0000
Re: [xml-dev] Binary versus Text, From Jeremy <jhgriffith@gmail.com> on 24 Nov 2013 19:05:27 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: [xml-dev] Binary versus Text, From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 24 Nov 2013 19:18:42 -0000
The pure essence of XML: these are the acceptable strings, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 25 Nov 2013 11:51:12 -0000
OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh ? SourceForge has gone to the dark side., From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 25 Nov 2013 14:24:16 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh? SourceForge has gone to the dark side., From Michael Sokolov <msokolov@safaribooksonline.com> on 25 Nov 2013 14:42:59 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh? SourceForge has gone to the dark side., From =?UTF-8?B?UGlvdHIgQmHFhHNraQ==?= <bansp@o2.pl> on 25 Nov 2013 14:51:49 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh ? SourceForge has gone to the dark side., From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 25 Nov 2013 18:34:58 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh? SourceForge has gone to the dark side., From Shlomi Fish <shlomif@shlomifish.org> on 25 Nov 2013 19:16:06 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh? SourceForge has gone to the dark side., From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 26 Nov 2013 01:29:46 -0000
OT++ RE: [xml-dev] OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool forxmlsh ? SourceForge has gone to the dark side., From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 25 Nov 2013 18:15:42 -0000
making of Lux, From Michael Sokolov <msokolov@safaribooksonline.com> on 25 Nov 2013 18:51:44 -0000
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML As Fall Guy, From Gareth Oakes <goakes@gpslsolutions.com> on 27 Nov 2013 05:33:26 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML As Fall Guy, From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 27 Nov 2013 08:12:18 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XML As Fall Guy, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 27 Nov 2013 17:19:45 -0000
Re: [xml-dev] How to do XML design, per Jackson Structured Design, From Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com> on 27 Nov 2013 15:51:37 -0000
In converting XML instance A to XML instance B, this property mustbe preserved: semantics, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 29 Nov 2013 15:10:13 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] In converting XML instance A to XML instance B, this property must be preserved: semantics, From gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com on 29 Nov 2013 15:30:04 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] In converting XML instance A to XML instance B, thisproperty must be preserved: semantics, From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 29 Nov 2013 17:03:10 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] In converting XML instance A to XML instance B, this property must be preserved: semantics, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 29 Nov 2013 18:15:29 -0000
- RE: In converting XML instance A to XML instance B, this propertymust be preserved: semantics, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 29 Nov 2013 19:18:07 -0000
ANN: Does an XML Document Have Semantics?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 30 Nov 2013 18:04:01 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Does an XML Document Have Semantics?, From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 30 Nov 2013 20:03:42 -0000

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.14