(As to the latter point, I have never understood why the W3C was allowed to escape prosecution under the Sherman Antitrust Act. I know the theory: that TimBL has absolute authority, and therefore W3C is technically not a conspiracy in restraint of trade. But that doesn't change the fact that it is indeed a conspiracy that has allowed multiple market leaders to collude in secret sessions with the net result of restraining trade, once TimBL says "OK".)