[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML As Fall Guy
- From: Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 16:22:50 -0500
Business leadership -- the inspiration of a viable, stable,
financial-resource-wielding culture -- is something very special. Wall
Street recognizes this fact (but not necessarily the leaders who do it).
Technical leadership -- the inspiration of a viable, stable,
technology-resource-wielding culture -- is at least equally rare. (The
completion of this thought is left as an exercise for the reader, with
my warning/ suggestion that it's probably more complex and subtle than
one might think.)
On 11/29/2013 02:32 PM, John Cowan wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:53 AM, <cbullard@hiwaay.net
> <mailto:cbullard@hiwaay.net>> wrote:
>
> At the core was a team of civil servants who specified it, designed
> it AND managed its fabrication and fielding. This team had been
> together developing these systems for three decades: German Rocket
> Scientists. The Von Braun Team.
>
>
> In short, what de Marco and Lister call a "jelled team". Unfortunately,
> we don't know how to create those, only how to destroy them. The
> chapter on teamicide in /Peopleware/ starts thus:
>
> What's called for here is a concise chapter entitled "Making
> Teams Jell at Your Company." It should have half a dozen simple
> prescriptions for good team formation. These prescriptions should
> be enough to guarantee jelled teams. In the planning stage of this
> work, that is exactly the chapter we expected to write. We were
> confident. How difficult could it be to cut to the heart of the matter
> and give the reader practical tools to aid the process of making teams
> jell? We would apply all our skills, all our experience; we would
> overwhelm the problem with logic and pure brilliance. That's how
> it looked in the planning stage....
>
>
>
> Between plan and execution, there were a few distressing
> encounters with reality. The first of these was that we just couldn't
> come up with the six prescriptions needed for the chapter. We got
> stuck at zero. We'd been prepared to scale our expectations down a
> bit, but not this much. ("Zero Things You Can Do to Make Teams
> Jell"?) It seemed clear that something was wrong with the under-
> lying notion of the chapter. What was wrong was the whole idea of
> making teams jell. You can't make teams jell. You can hope they
> will jell; you can cross your fingers; you can act to improve the odds
> of jelling; but you can't make it happen. The process is much too
> fragile to be controlled.
>
>
> Instead, they explain seven ways (in the 2e, nine ways) to /prevent
> /teams from jelling, a much simpler matter. Alas, in 2013 all of these
> ways are still in regular use by management — and they explain why both
> Clueless and Sociopath managers (without using those terms) are
> interested in preventing teams from jelling.
>
> A truly great book, whose only defect is that those who need it most
> will never heed it. I see that it has a new edition this year; I
> suppose I'll have to break down and buy it.
>
> --
> GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at
> http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]