XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Lessons learned from the XML experiment

On 11/14/2013 10:36 AM, Uche Ogbuji wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Pete Cordell <petexmldev@codalogic.com> wrote:
It's ironic that the design of associating a namespace with every element meant that you didn't have to drag context information from parent nodes (as would be required in Michael's example below), but the implementation using prefixes meant that you have to drag context information from parent nodes!

Well yes. Even though making URIs an intrinsic part of names was a mistake in XML Namespaces, it wasn't the biggest mistake. The biggest mistake was the hierarchical scoping mechanism that spawned prefixes, and thus the ultimate evil of QNames in content.
I'm also not fond of a data model that defines a name as a three-part entity (prefix, localname, namespace) instead of a single string: it's a mess.

-Mike


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS