Re: [xml-dev] Binary versus Text

[Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com>]

As a practical matter, is there *any* difference between text and binary
data *other* than the necessity of worrying about record-end handling in
the former, but not in the latter?

The problem with John's definition is that it begs the question, "What
does 'interpretation as a stream of characters' mean?"  For many years,
the Wall Street Journal's editorial policy was to describe data sizes as
numbers of characters or, for large numbers, Encyclopedia Brittanicas,
irrespective of whether the data were in fact characters.  The policy
was justified, not only because of the erstwhile naivete of their reader
base, but also, I would argue, because the distinction between
interpretability-as-characters and the lack thereof is not clear.
Regular expressions, for example, are quite useful for detecting
patterns in purely numeric data streams.  Does that make such streams
*text*?

Charles Goldfarb used to say, "If there are bugs in a text-processing
system, at least one of them will have to do with record-end handling."
That rule-of-thumb is perhaps dated now, but the absurd
human-productivity-diminishing differences between Unix, Microsoft, and
Apple record-end conventions are still very much with us.  It's sort of
like  the railroad gauges that did (or did not) descend from the
distances between pairs of ancient chariot wheels; they are the echoes
of empires.  (AFAIK, you still have to change trains, or at least
undercarriages, when crossing into Ukraine.)



On 11/24/2013 09:25 AM, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> 
>  
> 
> Distinguishing "text" versus "binary" is important.
> 
>  
> 
> On October 30 we had a discussion titled, "Is the binary file format dead?"
> 
>  
> 
> During that discussion John Cowan made an excellent distinction between
> binary and text files. I thought it would be useful to summarize the
> distinction.
> 
>  
> 
> The universe of computer files falls into two categories:
> 
>  
> 
> 1. Binary files
> 
> 2. Text files
> 
>  
> 
> By convention we normally restrict "binary" to files which are not
> interpretable as streams of characters. [John Cowan]
> 
>  
> 
> The word "text" is applied to files which are interpretable as streams
> of characters.
> 
>  
> 
> Of course any text file is also a binary file, since the class of text
> files is obtained from the class of binary files by applying
> restrictions. But it would be confusing to call a text file a binary
> file; it would be like calling a cat a mammal: correct but imprecise.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> /Roger
>