XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] [OT] Re: [xml-dev] Lessons learned from the XML experiment

On 11/15/13 11:42 AM, David Sheets wrote:

After you.
This is evasive. You have submitted a claim that this SO issue as an
"XML WTF" which is attributable to a type discipline. If you do not
defend your claim, we cannot rationally accept it.

Further, you made the claim that "XML is not designed for nodes". If
you are unwilling to defend this claim, it, too, must be rejected.
The history is on Uche's side. If you want to claim that XML has a data model, that it was "designed for nodes", you have a lot of revisionism to do.

Are you interested in developing actual, useful theories or simply
wasting everyone's time?
Indeed.

--
Simon St.Laurent
http://simonstl.com/


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS