XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Preoccupation with zero, empty strings, empty elements, emptyeverything

Hi Folks,

When was the last time you went to the store to purchase zero oranges?

When was the last time you created an XML document to have zero elements?

Those are strange concepts, aren't they?

Zero is a strange concept. 

Roughly 1500 years after the introduction of zero as a number by mathematicians in India, the concept is still not well accepted in computer science:

	- Many programming languages do not 
	  support records with zero fields

	- Many programming languages do not 
	  support arrays with zero elements

	- Many programming languages do not 
	  support variable definitions with zero 
	  variables

	- In some programming languages the 
	  syntax for calling a routine with zero 
	  parameters differs from that for a 
	  routine with one or more parameters

	- XML has a special syntax for empty 
	  elements

	- Many compilers refuse to compile a 
	  module that defines zero names

	- No parser generator can produce a 
	  parser for the empty language (the 
	  language with zero strings)

This preoccupation with empty strings, sets, languages, etc. is not frivolous, since it is well-known that the ease with which a system handles empty cases is a measure of its cleanliness and robustness.

Most (not all) of the above is from the book: "Parsing Techniques" by Grune and Jacobs.

/Roger


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS