Re: [xml-dev] Preoccupation with zero, empty strings, empty elements, em

[gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com]

In the UBL project we specifically prohibit elements with element 
content to have zero children.  Elements either have text as their 
child or have other elements as their children.

To our users, some of whom are not very technical, we explain 
ourselves with a couple of paragraphs and a conclusion here:

  http://docs.oasis-open.org/ubl/os-UBL-2.1/UBL-2.1.html#S-EMPTY-ELEMENTS
  "UBL takes the position that empty elements do not provide the level
   of assurance necessary for business information exchanges and
   therefore must not be used."

... and have reduced the requirement to the following rules:

   [IND5] UBL conformant instance documents MUST NOT contain an
          element devoid of content or containing null values,
          except in the case of extension, where the UBL
          ExtensionContent element is used.

   [IND6] The absence of a construct or data in a UBL instance
          document MUST NOT carry meaning.

. . . . . . . Ken

At 2013-12-07 13:34 +0000, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> When was the last time you went to the store to purchase zero oranges?
>
> When was the last time you created an XML document to have zero elements?
>
> Those are strange concepts, aren't they?
>
> Zero is a strange concept.
>
> Roughly 1500 years after the introduction of zero as a number by 
> mathematicians in India, the concept is still not well accepted in 
> computer science:
>
>         - Many programming languages do not
>           support records with zero fields
>
>         - Many programming languages do not
>           support arrays with zero elements
>
>         - Many programming languages do not
>           support variable definitions with zero
>           variables
>
>         - In some programming languages the
>           syntax for calling a routine with zero
>           parameters differs from that for a
>           routine with one or more parameters
>
>         - XML has a special syntax for empty
>           elements
>
>         - Many compilers refuse to compile a
>           module that defines zero names
>
>         - No parser generator can produce a
>           parser for the empty language (the
>           language with zero strings)
>
> This preoccupation with empty strings, sets, languages, etc. is not 
> frivolous, since it is well-known that the ease with which a system 
> handles empty cases is a measure of its cleanliness and robustness.
>
> Most (not all) of the above is from the book: "Parsing Techniques" 
> by Grune and Jacobs.
>
> /Roger

--
Public XSLT, XSL-FO, UBL & code list classes: Melbourne, AU May 2014 |
Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training |
Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm |
Crane Softwrights Ltd.            http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/x/ |
G. Ken Holman                   mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com |
Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about |
Legal business disclaimers:    http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal |