XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Percentage of web services supporting XML versus JSON

On 06/09/2014 10:24 AM, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
Loac says that a data format should have these properties:

	- Hyperlinks and link relations
     	- Binary, explicit sizes, efficient to parse
     	- Small, exponentially smaller the larger the data gets
     	- Good type coverage, extensible
     	- No NULL value
     	- Fully specified

Do you agree with those properties? Would you add other properties? Would you remove some of the properties?
For my purposes, binary imposes more costs than benefits. I don't give a damn about types, but extensibility is crucial.

The piece that's deeply intriguing here, though, is:

"Small, exponentially smaller the larger the data gets"

The first signs I saw of trouble for XML were all around that conversation, as I got into the mapping space. At that point, XML's doubling or tripling the cost of storage was a problem. Today it's more about bandwidth.

If there's a way around that, it's a HUGE selling point.

Thanks,
Simon

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@simonstl.com]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 10:00 AM
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Percentage of web services supporting XML versus JSON

Okay - Loic's talk is up, though he's in the middle of a conference.

<http://ninenines.eu/talks/bed/bed.html>

Why Not JSON? is slide 19. Why Not XML? is slide 22.

He sketches out his (binary) alternative from 23 on.  I want to see a
lot more detail, but I wish this had existed a decade ago if only for
conversational use.

Thanks,
Simon



On 06/09/2014 09:49 AM, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
On 06/09/2014 09:44 AM, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
Loic says that JSON is "a terrible format" because:
I am so confused to see JSON defended on xml-dev... ;)

I'll check in with Loic and see what he's actually proposing, then try
to bring something more complete back here.

Thanks,
Simon

_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS