[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] RE: List of differences between XML and JSON?
- From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
- To: Thomas Passin <list1@tompassin.net>,"xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 09:11:59 -0400
At 2015-05-02 08:52 -0400, Thomas Passin wrote:
XML markup isn't fundamentally limited to "hasA".
The specific aspect being discussed was XML syntax.
Consider RDF. ... an "existential conjunctive" language, which
means that it can declare both isA and hasA notions. RDF graphs can
be expressed with an XML syntax. Therefore, (at least some) XML
languages are able to express isA.
Absolutely, yes ... I said it myself:
At 2015-05-01 17:24 -0400, G. Ken Holman wrote:
Anyone gets to interpret "isA" any way they wish, but in the syntax
... the start and end tags contain ("hasA") their descendants.
Interpretation of content is in the eye of the beholder. Just
because I choose to mark up text with my understanding of a semantic
behind why I marked it up, anyone else can choose to interpret the
markup any way they wish.
The "hasA" is inherent in the syntax. Elements have
attribute. Elements have descendants. Elements and attributes can
have very rich labels using namespaces so as to unambiguously label
what has what.
But XML stops there ... it is the applications conferring semantics
on what has been marked up that adds layers of "isA" or anything else
on the marked up content.
All power to anyone who wishes to interpret what has been marked up
any way they want ... including the RDF semantics.
So, I believe the "isA" you have described is a property of the RDF,
not a property of the XML that expresses the RDF.
At 2015-05-02 08:52 -0400, Thomas Passin wrote:
No, XML expresses *relationships*, which may or may not be
hierarchical. You can describe fully non-hierarchical data, such as
maps or graphs, with several different methods.
I disagree ... I believe it is the application interpreting the
syntax to infer a relationship between content that has been marked
up only with "hasA". Even ID/IDREF is but the property of having a
pointer ... it is up to the application to interpret what that pointer means.
. . . . . . . Ken
--
Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources |
Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/video.htm |
Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/x/ |
G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com |
Google+ profile: http://plus.google.com/+GKenHolman-Crane/about |
Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal |
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]