[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
=?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_=5Bxml=2Ddev=5D_Don=E2=80=99t_create_elements_with_simple_co?==?UTF-8?Q?ntent_and_attributes?=
- From: David Carlisle <d.p.carlisle@gmail.com>
- To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:06:49 +0100
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 at 13:54, Costello, Roger L. <costello@mitre.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I hold this to be the fundamental axiom of XML:
>
> Make the structure of data explicit.
>
> We accomplish that by adding a label (markup) to the data.
>
> There are various terms for this notion of making the structure of data explicit: upconversion and uptranslation.
>
> Elements with simple content and attributes are antithetical to the fundamental axiom of XML.
>
> Here is an element with simple content and an attribute:
>
> <Cost currency="USD">8.95</Cost>
>
>
>
> The data USD is explicitly labeled. The label indicates that USD is a currency.
>
> What about the data 8.95, is it labeled? No! It is anonymous/unlabeled. Note: Cost is not the label for 8.95; Cost is the label for the whole package.
>
> In my most recent post, I asked, “What is that number (8.95)?” I received excellent responses: 8.95 is a price, 8.95 is an amount, etc. External knowledge was needed to label the data. The need for external knowledge completely contradicts the fundamental axiom of XML.
>
> Therefore, don’t create XML like this:
>
> <Cost currency="USD">8.95</Cost>
>
> instead, create XML like this:
>
> <Cost>
> <Currency>USD</Currency>
> <Amount>8.95</Amount>
> </Cost>
>
>
>
> Do you agree?
No.
David
>
>
>
> /Roger
>
>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]