XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
The remarkable similarities between XSLT and Flex/Lex

Hi Folks,

Flex and Lex are tools to auto-generate lexical analyzers. Flex is a successor to Lex. Lex was created 47 years ago. Flex was created about the same time as XSLT.

There is a remarkable similarity between Flex/Lex and XSLT. One wonders if some members of the XSLT 1.0 Working Group were Lex users and were influenced by its concepts?

Here are some of the similarities between Flex/Lex and XSLT:

- Both are pattern-matching languages, i.e., 

	pattern	  action
	pattern   action
	pattern   action

- Both allow you to create subsets:

	- The XSLT "mode" allows the program to effectively be broken into a set of mini XSLT programs
	- The Flex/Lex "start condition" allows the lexer to effectively be broken into a set of mini lexers

- Both have a default rule that is executed when no other rule matches

There are some differences, of course:

- XSLT is primarily for processing XML but it can process plain text, whereas Flex/Lex is primarily for processing plain text (esp. source code) but it can process XML

- XSLT uses XPath as its pattern-matching language, whereas Flex/Lex uses regular expressions as its pattern-matching language

Pretty interesting, I think!

/Roger


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS