XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] It is okay for things to break in the future!

Maybe spend a while with Walter Perry, or at least his older posts?  He was repeating "I Guess Everyone Else's Perspective" from the beginning here.  Though not precisely that it's not possible to model the world so much as it's not possible to share models of the world.

Thanks,
Simon

On 9/4/2022 6:11 PM, Roger L Costello wrote:
Damian provides an excellent summary of the two perspectives.

Here is a slight revision of Damian's summary:

Roger's Perspective: It is possible to know the current world. Developers can and should model the current world. The benefits of flagging data that violates the model outweighs the benefits of "coding for the future."

I Guess Everyone Else's Perspective: It is not possible to model the world. Even in incredibly simple ways. The costs of breaking the model when the world doesn’t agree with the model outweighs the benefits of flagging invalid data.

/Roger


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS