← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Fwd: I did some more research; please add agenda item for 4/2 on TechComm in 2.0

From
Kristen James Eberlein <>
Date
2019-04-02T14:32:24+00:00
ID
Thread
Fwd: I did some more research; please add agenda item for 4/2 on TechComm in 2.0
Forwarding (hope that is OK, Nancy!) to flesh out the agenda
      item.

    
Best,

      Kris

      

      Kristen James Eberlein

      Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee

      Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting

      www.eberleinconsulting.com

      +1 919 622-1501; kriseberlein (skype)

      

    

    

      

      -------- Forwarded Message --------
      
        
          

            Subject:
            
            I did some more research; please add agenda item for 4/2
              on TechComm in 2.0
          

          

            Date: 
            Thu, 28 Mar 2019 15:18:37 -0700
          

          

            From: 
            Nancy <>
          

          

            To: 
            Kristen James Eberlein
              <>, Robert D Anderson
              <>
          

          

            CC: 
            Tom Magliery <>
          

        
      
      

      

      

        
Hi,

        

        

        
After my previous mail to you this morning, I did some
          searching of my own in the DITA Github repositories, and as
          far as I can tell, there has been no doctype work done on
          techcomm for 2.0, probably because we've decided to separate
          it into its own profile. Unless there's been work done, but
          none of it checked in... But I think it's time to take it up,
          since we seem to be making progress on 2.0, and a great number
          of users depend on the techcomm package being available to go
          with base DITA.

        

        

        
Can we add it to next week's agenda? I would be glad to do
          some grunt work on moving/populating techcomm grammar files to
          the 2.0 techcomm repository, since I need to have that
          structure available in order to create my DITA/NA
          presentation. And given that Eric is working on his bookmap
          proposal, won't we need to move his bookmap grammar files to a
          2.0 techcomm doctypes repository? (which does not yet
          exist...)

        

        

        

        
Thanks,

        
Nancy

        

        

          

            
_____________

              Nancy Harrison

              Infobridge Solutions 

              
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →