Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [docbook-apps] footnote mark rendering with 1.77.1 stylesheets

From
Tim Arnold <>
Date
2013-10-18T13:08:18+00:00
ID
CA+O6OTDjPvWeCYkO6Kdx6CVLeu=
Thread
Re: [docbook-apps] footnote mark rendering with 1.77.1 stylesheets
hi, that's a good idea, but I think this is straight html. The
footnote mark source:
<sup class="footnote"><a name="d0e667208"></a>[28]</sup></a>

and the doctype is given at the top of the file as (note the html
'link' tag is not self closing):

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd"><html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="style.css">

this top content is also shown in the dom inspector. In any case, the
stylesheets are working correctly.
thanks,
--Tim


On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Jirka Kosek <> wrote:
> It might be that you are producing XHTML, but parser in browser treat it as
> HTML, because of wrong mime type or extension.
>
> Tim Arnold <> napsal(a):
>>
>> hi Jirka, that is one nice crystal ball you have!
>> You are right, I was looking at the DOM inspector in Chrome.
>> When I look at the source everything is correct.
>>
>> Which made me check it with a couple of other browsers.
>> I IE, it is *displayed* correctly; with Chrome, Firefox, and Opera the [1]
>> is displayed without being superscripted. The DOM inspector for those
>> browsers put the [1] outside the 'sup' tag.
>>
>> thanks,
>> --Tim
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Jirka Kosek <> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 16.10.2013 21:46, Tim Arnold wrote:
>>> > The rendered footnote mark is structured like this:
>>> > ----------------
>>> > <a href="#ftn.id286817273" class="footnote">
>>> >   <sup class="footnote"></sup>
>>> > </a>
>>> > <a name="id286817273"></a>
>>> > [1] will be charged etc...
>>> >
>>> > Is that a bug?
>>>
>>> Probably yes, but probably not in the stylesheets.
>>>
>>> Are you sure that you were looking on the direct result of
>>> transformation and there were no additional step applied to HTML like
>>> HTML-tidy?
>>>
>>> Have you been looking at HTML source or have you been using DOM
>>> inspector in your browser?
>>>
>>>                                 Jirka
>>>
>>> --
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>   Jirka Kosek      e-mail:       http://xmlguru.cz
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>        Professional XML consulting and training services
>>>   DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>  OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep.
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>     Bringing you XML Prague conference    http://xmlprague.cz
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Odesláno z mého telefonu s Androidem pomocí pošty K-9 Mail. Omluvte prosím
> mou stručnost.
Next in thread → Next in month →