At 8 Mar 2000 13:22 -0500, Norman Walsh wrote: > <!-- The DocBook TC may produce an official MathML module for DocBook. --> > <!-- This PE provides the hook by which it can be inserted into the DTD. --> > <!ENTITY % mathml.hook
> > <!ENTITY % equation.content (alt?, (graphic+ mediaobject+)) %mathml.hook; > >
> ... >
> <!ENTITY % equation.element INCLUDE > > <![%equation.element;[ > <!ELEMENT equation ((%formalobject.title.content;)?, (informalequation
> %equation.content;))> > <!--end of equation.element-->]]> %mathml.hook; appears out of place to me. I can see that defining %mathml.hook; as
mathml would make a valid content model, but it seems odd that the
is part the model group in the <equation> definition, not part of a model group contained in %equation.content;, which is where %mathml.hook; is referenced. What about: <!ENTITY % equation.content (alt?, (graphic+ mediaobject+%mathml.hook;))
>
Will %mathml.hook; be also added to <informalequation> and <inlineequation>? Regards,
Tony Graham
======================================================================
Tony Graham
mailto:
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.
http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street
Direct
Phone: 301/315-9632
Suite 207
Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD 20850
Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================
