Sorry
--
I was asking to allow IndexTerms in Highlights in the SGML version. (I wasn't thinking about XML.) But now I'm puzzled about their validity in previous SGML DocBook. I thought they were valid at some point. (DocBook: TDG says they are OK.) But I see that they were excluded in 3.0 and 2.4 as well. Hmmmmm -- request withdrawn. Michael
> / Michael Sabrio <> was heard to say:
>
I agree that it's a little weird to have IndexTerms in Highlights, but
>
what can I say -- authors are weird. >
>
So can you change DocBook 4 to allow them? >
> I think I've lost the beginning of this thread. How are your
> authors doing it now? They aren't allowed there in the SGML DTD. >
> I think it would be a bad idea to add them to the XML version
> without also adding them to the SGML version. >
>
Be seeing you,
>
norm >
> --
> Norman Walsh <>
I'm not tense, I'm just terribly,
> Principal Software Engineer
terribly alert.
> Arbortext, Inc. (www.arbortext.com)
> 413.256.6985 Voice/FAX
