On 1 February 2011 18:24, Scott Hudson <> wrote:
> How shall DocBook Publishers documents be versioned? Should it be similar to
> simplified, such that: >
> 5.0-extension publishers-1.0 I've always expected the version to be numeric Scott? Equally, is @version used anywhere such that it would make it clear that I am processing pubs rather than plain docbook?
>
> It is not a true subset of DocBook 5.0, due to the additions of Dublin Core,
> speaker, line, linegroup, drama, dialogue, and poetry.
For which TDG is clear. "Don't call it docbook" Bit late now, but renaming the document element to x-pubs, where x is book/article/... perhaps? Or simpler, just give it a clear / different name, then use docbook ns etc? First time for docbook I guess. Is website a fair comparison? regards
--
Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
